The True Cost of Building Analytics In-House: Time, Talent, and Money You Can’t Get Back

Embedded analytics (dashboards, interactive reporting, self-service insights) is now a baseline expectation for SaaS products. Users want data inside the app where they work, not in a detached BI tool or endlessly exported CSVs. But while the need is clear, the approach isn’t always.

Many technical teams assume they should build analytics themselves. After all, they have data engineers, product engineers, and a roadmap. But when you break down the real costs in the U.S. market, and compare them to embedding a purpose-built platform like Luzmo, the numbers tell a different story.

This isn’t theoretical. It’s grounded in publicly available pricing and real customer outcomes.

Why Analytics Isn’t Free, Even When You Build It Yourself

When teams talk about building analytics in-house, they often underestimate the scope. Big features rarely stay small, and dashboards quickly intersect with architecture, data quality, performance, UX design, permissions, and ongoing support.

Here’s what U.S. core salaries look like for roles typically involved in an internal analytics build:

• Data Engineer: ~$120,000+ base salary per year
• Data Scientist: ~$110,000+ base salary per year
• BI / Analytics Specialist: ~$85,000+ base salary per year
• UX / Data Designer and QA: additional roles often forgotten at the start

Those are base figures. In practice, most finance teams multiply by 1.25× to 1.5× to estimate fully loaded cost — accounting for benefits, payroll taxes, recruitment, equipment, and turnover. That quickly turns a single hire into a $150,000–$180,000+ investment on the books.

Now, imagine the team you’d realistically need to build, test, and maintain embedded analytics that customers actually use:

• 1 Data Engineer
• 1 Data Scientist
• 1 BI/Analytics Developer
• UX Designer
• QA/Testing Support

Just personnel costs for year one land comfortably in the $350,000–$500,000+ range — and this is a conservative estimate, not a “best case” scenario. It also assumes those engineers aren’t pulled off core product work for other priorities.

Meanwhile, early estimates that suggest six months to a first usable dashboard frequently stretch into 9–12 months of development before the product feels production-ready. That’s real engineering time tied up in a feature that isn’t your core product. 

The Buy Alternative → Predictable Pricing, Predictable Value

Contrast that with Luzmo’s published pricing, transparently listed at:

• Basic: ~$995/month (~$12,000/year)
• Pro: ~$2,050/month (~$24,000/year)
• Elite: ~$3,100/month (~$37,000/year) 

Even at the Elite tier, you’re talking about less than $40,000 per year for enterprise-grade embedded analytics; a feature that would take hundreds of thousands in salaries and months of work to build internally.

What’s included goes far beyond simple charts:

• White-label, fully branded analytics
• Self-service dashboards embedded inside your SaaS product
• API access and flexible integration points
• Ongoing platform updates and improvements
• Support and customer success guidance

This is not a basic report generator. It’s a purpose-built SaaS embedding platform designed so engineering teams can deliver analytics in weeks, not quarters. 

Putting the Numbers Side by Side

Here’s the stark, high-level comparison:

Internal Build (Year 1)

• Personnel + overhead: $350,000–$500,000+
• Time to shipping value: ~9–12+ months
• Maintenance: ongoing — absorbs engineering cycles

Buy with Luzmo (Year 1)

• Licensing: $12,000–$37,000
• Time to shipping value: ~weeks
• Maintenance: handled by vendor, freeing your team

The differential is an order of magnitude, not a rounding error.

What Happens When Companies Actually Buy Instead of Build

Numbers are compelling, but outcomes resonate with executives. Here are several verified Luzmo customer stories that illustrate these economics in practice:

Lansweeper: Years of Work Replaced by Weeks of Value

Lansweeper, a technology asset intelligence platform, chose to integrate Luzmo rather than continue investing in custom analytics tooling they maintained internally. By adopting Luzmo’s embeddable analytics layer, they could deliver dashboards and reporting features without diverting internal engineering effort away from roadmap priorities.

This strategic partnership allowed Lansweeper to accelerate innovation, free engineering resources, and give customers a more powerful analytics experience — without reinventing core analytics from scratch. Their teams could focus on core capabilities, while Luzmo handled the analytics layer. 

Real result: Customers received full, interactive analytics inside the product, and Lansweeper regained engineering capacity that would otherwise have been consumed by building and maintaining analytics features.

Read more: Lansweeper x Luzmo | case study

Katana: Self-Service Analytics Without Spinning Up a Data Team

Katana, a cloud-based inventory management platform, faced rising user demand for flexible data visualization and analysis. Rather than building and maintaining static dashboards or custom reporting endpoints, Katana embedded Luzmo to enable self-service dashboards directly inside their application.

With Luzmo in place, end users can build their own insights, ask natural-language questions that generate charts, and interact with live data without waiting on internal engineers to assemble or ship reports. This not only improves customer satisfaction but also shifts analytics workload away from engineering entirely.

Real result: Faster deployment of advanced analytics, improved user experience, and much lower cost than standing up a bespoke analytics stack.

Read more: Katana x Luzmo | case study

Hult Ashridge / Hult EF: Replacing Legacy Reporting With Modern Dashboards

Hult Ashridge Executive Education, part of the broader Hult EF corporate education ecosystem, found its internal analytics approach no longer served its enterprise customer needs. They needed real-time, permission-aware dashboards that could scale with client demand and fit seamlessly inside the learning platform experience.

Embedding Luzmo allowed them to replace legacy reporting systems and give clients access to live, branded dashboards without expanding data teams or spending months building custom solutions. 

Real result: Modernized, scalable analytics delivered inside the application experience, with internal teams freed from maintaining bespoke tooling.

Read more: Hult x Luzmo | case study

Beyond Cost: The Hidden Risks of DIY Analytics

When engineering teams take on analytics, they inevitably pay another type of cost — one that rarely shows up in spreadsheets but is real in product velocity:

• Technical debt accrues fast as quick fixes, query optimization, and edge cases pile up.
• Backlog congestion increases as analytics jobs compete with core roadmap priorities.
• Recruitment challenges intensify, especially for specialized analytics engineers in a tight labor market.

These are the lived experience of many SaaS teams that spin up analytics projects only to find them perpetually unfinished or consuming a disproportionate share of developer time. Independent build-vs-buy frameworks consistently highlight this reality.

When Building Does Make Sense, And When It Doesn’t

To be clear, there are some rare scenarios where building your own analytics may align with strategic goals: for example, when analytics itself is your core product differentiator, deeply entwined with IP that drives brand value and revenue. In those cases, investing in internal talent and tooling can be justified.

But for most SaaS products where analytics enhances customer experience rather than embodies the core value proposition, the economics lean heavily toward buying a platform designed for embedding analytics.

Takeaways for Leadership Teams

Here’s the takeaway, in practical terms:

1. Internal build costs often exceed $350,000 in year one when you account for loaded salaries and the full team needed to deliver a usable analytics stack.
2. Luzmo’s embedded analytics platform costs $12,000–$37,000/year and gets you live far faster. 
3. Case studies show real product teams redirecting engineering effort back to core features while Luzmo powers analytics inside the app. 

For decision-makers balancing roadmap velocity, financial discipline, and customer expectations, these figures matter. Analytics is essential, but how you deliver it should make strategic sense — not just technical sense.

If you’re evaluating embedded analytics for your SaaS product, grounding the discussion in actual cost comparisons and real business outcomes will help ensure you choose the path that best supports both growth and resource efficiency.

Ready to stop spending hundreds of thousands and start delivering analytics in weeks? Experience how fast you can embed interactive dashboards into your product with Luzmo. 

‍