Skip to main content
On this page

Comparison guide

Luzmo vs GoodData for embedded analytics

Luzmo and GoodData both embed analytics in customer-facing products. Luzmo ships a packaged analytics and AI product inside your application, so dashboards, APIs, and AI return the same tenant-scoped number; GoodData provides the governed infrastructure to configure workspaces, metrics, and agents.

Short answer

ChooseLuzmoif

  • You want a packaged analyst in the product, not an agent factory.
  • Dashboard, API, and AI must agree on the metric.
  • Your cost model should follow the unit that drives your product: active analytics users or independently governed customer workspaces.

ChooseGoodDataif

  • Each customer should be a governed workspace.
  • You need Agent Builder, conversation memory, BYOLLM, or self-hosting.
  • Analytics-as-code and DEV/TEST/PROD are decisive.

4.6/5 on G2(opens in new tab) and Capterra(opens in new tab)

What product teams gain with Luzmo

Lansweeper
"With Luzmo, we skipped three years of development time and immediately jumped to a full-blown solution."
Maarten Saeys, CPO, Lansweeper

At a glance

Six buyer-level splits. Scan Luzmo against GoodData in about thirty seconds.

What Luzmo and GoodData are

Both are genuine embedded analytics platforms. Luzmo is the product-shaped analytics and AI layer in the host app: a consistent tenant-scoped experience built into the product you ship. GoodData is governed analytics infrastructure: workspaces, metrics, and agents that your team configures and operates. This is not internal BI versus embedded analytics.

Luzmo and GoodData both support embedded analytics. As analytics becomes an AI interaction surface, the core question is whether that surface should inherit the product’s tenant scope, metric logic, and UX, or become a separate analytics platform to configure. Software teams are a frequent Luzmo buyer. The category is customer-facing analytics in data-intensive products, not SaaS only.

Luzmo
A packaged analytics and AI product for customer-facing use in data-intensive products. Semantic and knowledge layers ground dashboards, APIs, and IQ on one metric model, with tenant scope on every surface.

Last verified:Sources: Luzmo semantic layer (opens in new tab), Luzmo embedded analytics (opens in new tab), Luzmo developer documentation (opens in new tab).

GoodData
Governed analytics infrastructure for internal analytics, embedded data products, and AI agents on the same logical data model and MAQL metrics, configured across workspaces.

Last verified:Sources: GoodData (opens in new tab), GoodData embedded visualizations (opens in new tab), GoodData rebrand (opens in new tab).

Key differences in one minute

Five documented differences. Each block is a fact, then why it matters for a buyer, then the source.

  1. 1. Adoption pricing vs workspace pricing

    Luzmo publishes Embedded Everywhere from $2,495 per month billed annually, plus AI and Warp usage. Some contracts scale on monthly active users instead. GoodData Professional is a quote-based platform fee plus the number of workspaces. Enterprise is custom. Do not treat GoodData as per-viewer seat pricing.

    Why it matters: Product teams scale either in active end users or in independently governed customer workspaces. That choice can change TCO more than any feature cell. Model tenants, environments, and AI queries before you call either cheaper.

  2. 2. Same number in the product vs governed analytics infrastructure

    Luzmo can centralize product-facing metric definitions so dashboards, APIs, and AI use the same governed logic. GoodData uses a logical data model and MAQL metrics as core architecture, plus hierarchical workspaces for tenants.

    Why it matters: Product teams need one answer in the app they ship. Teams that want the analytics vendor as infrastructure for BI, embed, and agents get more from GoodData.

  3. 3. Host-app authorization vs hierarchical workspaces

    Luzmo scopes embeds with host-app authorization and dataset attributes. GoodData uses hierarchical parent and child workspaces, Workspace Data Filters for tenant isolation, and User Data Filters for row-level security.

    Why it matters: Ask whether each customer should be an explicit governed analytics workspace. If yes, GoodData hierarchy is particularly strong for shared content plus tenant-specific extensions.

  4. 4. Packaged analyst agent vs an agent factory

    Luzmo ships a packaged analyst agent, plus chart generation, through the same query engine, metric model, and embed token as the dashboards. MCP exposes those tools, white-labeled and tenant-scoped, for agents the customer already runs. GoodData documents an agent factory: Agentic Assistant, Agent Builder, AI Memory, AI Knowledge, bring-your-own LLM (BYOLLM), MCP, and the Agent-to-Agent (A2A) protocol. The full agentic module is Enterprise or add-on territory under current legal terms.

    Why it matters: The job is a governed answer in the host product. Building and governing a customer-authored agent fleet is a documented GoodData strength.

  5. 5. Managed-first vs self-hostable deployment

    Luzmo is managed cloud, with Enterprise deployment adaptation. GoodData Professional is managed SaaS on AWS or Azure. Enterprise adds dedicated cluster, multi-region, and self-hosted options, including GoodData.CN.

    Why it matters: Self-hosting, private cloud, or on-prem is a real GoodData shortlist reason. Do not treat Luzmo as an automatic substitute for a GoodData.CN requirement.

Feature comparison

Documented capabilities, not product quality. Partial means the capability is supported under a plan, embedding mode, framework, or other documented constraint, not that it is inferior. Read the scope chip before treating a cell as a universal yes.

Showing 6 AI capabilities.

Detailed feature comparison of Luzmo and GoodData.
Feature LuzmoGoodData Conditions / scope
Embedded conversational AI

Yes

Packaged Luzmo analyst agent in the host application, on the same model and tenant token as the dashboards.

Yes

Agentic AI Assistant. Rollout is gradual. Embedded iframe Assistant became GA on 2 July 2026.

Implementation

GoodData: gradual rollout of the agentic experience

Customer-authored agent fleet

Partial

Luzmo ships first-party analyst and chart agents. There is no public Agent Builder for customers to author their own fleet.

Yes

Agent Builder became GA on 21 May 2026. Agents can differ by skills, knowledge, and user groups.

Plan constraint

GoodData: Enterprise / AI module

Conversation memory across sessions

No

Past conversations do not feed new ones. Product does not support that memory.

Yes

Organization-level AI Memory became GA on 2 July 2026.

Plan constraint

GoodData: Enterprise AI module

MCP server

Yes

Hosted MCP. Embed-token tenancy. Tools can be reused in a customer MCP and white-labeled for end users.

Yes

GoodData MCP Server became GA on 21 May 2026. Current pricing advertises 30+ tools. Compare the same workflow, not the tool count.

See cell notes

Bring your own LLM (BYOLLM)

No

Bring-your-own LLM provider is not an official Luzmo offer.

Yes

BYOLLM: connect your own LLM provider. Documented on current Enterprise pricing.

Plan constraint

GoodData: Enterprise

Agent-to-Agent (A2A) protocol

No

A2A is not supported. Interop is REST and MCP.

Yes

Agent-to-Agent (A2A) protocol on current Enterprise pricing. Docs still mark parts as experimental.

Plan constraint

GoodData: Enterprise

How tenancy and identity work

Luzmo starts from the application user. GoodData often starts from a governed workspace. That is a real operating-model difference, not a feature checkbox.

The practical comparison is how a customer becomes an isolated analytics tenant, and how shared content rolls out.

Luzmo

  1. 1 Customer signs into your product.

  2. 2 Backend issues a short-lived embed token.

  3. 3 Dataset, dashboard, and feature access follow that token.

GoodData workspaces

  1. 1 Organization holds the platform.

  2. 2 Parent workspace shares the model, metrics, and dashboards.

  3. 3 Child workspaces isolate customers.

  4. 4 Workspace Data Filters and User Data Filters restrict data.

When Luzmo is a better fit, and when GoodData is a better fit

The fit depends on the job. Luzmo when that surface lives in the product. GoodData for workspaces, an agent factory, or self-hosting.

When Luzmo is a better fit

  • Public production starting price

    Luzmo publishes Embedded Everywhere from $2,495 per month billed annually. GoodData publishes the structure, not a Professional dollar price.

  • Priced on customer adoption

    The bill follows AI and Warp usage, and some contracts scale on monthly active users. That can map more naturally when many customers exist and analytics activity varies.

  • Packaged analyst agent

    Luzmo ships a first-party analyst agent, plus chart generation, on the same model and tenant token as the dashboards. You do not operate an agent factory. White-label MCP exposes those tools to agents you already run.

  • Same number on every surface

    Product-facing metrics are governed in one model. AI is evaluated through the same governed model and tenant permissions as the embedded experience.

  • Host-app identity

    Embed Authorization is built around users already authenticated in the host product. GoodData supports external IAM well, and still adds an explicit analytics workspace layer.

Assess your GoodData migration scope

When GoodData is a better fit

  • Hierarchical workspaces

    Parent workspaces can distribute models, metrics, and dashboards to large numbers of child tenants, with room for tenant-specific extensions.

  • Agent factory

    Agent Builder, conversation memory, bring-your-own LLM (BYOLLM), MCP, and Agent-to-Agent (A2A) are a documented stack for authoring and governing agents. That is a different job from a packaged analyst.

  • Analytics-as-code

    Declarative metadata, Git-friendly models, and Enterprise DEV/TEST/PROD are explicit. Luzmo is not an equivalent content-as-code workbench.

  • Self-hosting and deployment control

    Dedicated cluster, multi-region, and GoodData.CN matter for regulated, private-cloud, and on-prem buyers.

  • Workspace-based commercial model

    Professional is platform fee plus workspaces. Own IAM can support unlimited users. Putting several customers in one technical workspace does not automatically cut the license, because legal terms can still count discrete customers as workspaces.

    Our read: GoodData does not publish a Professional dollar price. Professional is platform fee plus workspaces. Luzmo publishes Embedded Everywhere from $2,495 per month billed annually, plus usage. Headline prices are not TCO.

Decision guide

Pick from the scenario. Workspaces, several agents, or self-hosting point to GoodData. Same-number analytics in the product you ship points to Luzmo.

  • Customer-facing analytics is the only analytics job

    Start with Luzmo. Governed metrics in the host product, same number on every surface, priced on adoption.

    Better fit: Luzmo

  • Each customer should be a separate governed analytics environment

    GoodData deserves a close look. Workspace hierarchy is designed around this.

    Better fit: GoodData

  • Many provisioned customers, few monthly analytics users

    Model both quotes. Luzmo follows adoption. GoodData follows workspace architecture. Neither is cheaper without the quote.

    Better fit: Both. Run the same job in each.

  • One definition should roll out to hundreds of tenants, with a few custom exceptions

    GoodData parent and child workspaces are particularly strong here.

    Better fit: GoodData

  • You need to author several specialized agents yourself

    GoodData Agent Builder, conversation memory, BYOLLM, and group assignment are the current documented stack for that job.

    Better fit: GoodData

  • You want a packaged analyst agent in the host product

    Luzmo ships the analyst, plus chart generation, grounded in the same model and tenant scope as the dashboards. MCP is how you connect agents you already run.

    Better fit: Luzmo

  • Self-hosting or on-prem is mandatory

    GoodData is the clearer shortlist. Confirm Luzmo hosting in contract before you treat it as a substitute.

    Better fit: GoodData

  • You need a transparent price before procurement

    Luzmo publishes a general-production starting point. GoodData requires a workspace quote.

    Better fit: Luzmo

Pricing snapshot

No universal cheaper answer. GoodData: quote-based platform plus workspaces, then custom Enterprise. Luzmo: one published Embedded Everywhere plan, then usage.

Luzmo

One plan, Embedded Everywhere, from $2,495 per month billed annually. The bill is a platform fee plus AI and Warp usage. Some contracts scale on monthly active users instead. The public package includes 500 governed AI conversations per month. There is no limit on the data you analyse. Warp includes 100 million rows, then $0.25 per extra million. White-labeling, self-service, and governed AI are included. Enterprise changes deployment, not the product.

GoodData

Professional is quote-based: platform fee plus the number of workspaces. The public page positions unlimited users and data, full embedding, multitenancy, and branding, with one environment. Legal terms allow unlimited users with your own IAM, or include up to 100 users with GoodData IAM. Enterprise is custom use-case pricing and adds advanced agents, three environments, CI/CD, audit logs, 99.5% SLA, and dedicated, multi-region, or self-hosted options. The full AI module is an Enterprise add-on per workspace unless agreed otherwise. AI Query Packages do not roll over.

Headline prices are not TCO. Map tenants to workspaces, then add environments, IAM, AI Query Packages, and hosting. Do not assume one technical workspace equals one commercial workspace.

Confirm current Luzmo list prices

Migrating embedded analytics from GoodData to Luzmo

You may not need to replace GoodData internally to move customer-facing analytics to Luzmo.

Treat this as a scoping exercise, not a rip-and-replace of the whole stack. Start with workspace hierarchy, the semantic model, and tenant-security rules before you count dashboards.

  1. Inventory workspaces, hierarchy, WDF, UDF, LDM, and MAQL metrics. Definitions do not port automatically.
  2. Decide how one-workspace-per-customer maps onto Luzmo embed authorization, dataset filters, and connection overrides.
  3. Expect redevelopment for GoodData.UI apps and dashboard plugins. They do not become Flex or Luzmo custom charts on their own.
  4. If the deployment uses custom agents, Memory, Knowledge, BYOLLM, A2A, or MCP, treat AI as a platform project, not an IQ rename.
  5. A GoodData.CN or hard on-prem requirement is a hosting question first. Do not assume Luzmo is a substitute.
  6. Complex MAQL may need deliberate translation. Do not promise an automated semantic migration.

Already embedding GoodData? Start with workspace hierarchy, the semantic model, and tenant-security rules before you count dashboards. Custom plugins, agents, and CI/CD workflows need a deliberate map. Scope that work before you estimate.

Frequently asked questions

Short answers on embedding, the semantic layer, workspaces, agents, pricing, and when GoodData is the better fit.

  • Is GoodData a real embedded analytics platform?

    Yes. Professional and Enterprise include embedded use, multi-tenancy, white-labeling, and SDK and API integration. Do not describe GoodData as internal BI only. See GoodData pricing. Last verified: 15 September 2026.

  • Is GoodData now called GoodData.AI?

    Yes. The company rebranded to GoodData.AI on 30 April 2026. Buyers still search Luzmo vs GoodData. See the rebrand announcement. Last verified: 15 September 2026.

  • What is the difference between Luzmo and GoodData?

    Both Luzmo and GoodData can embed analytics in customer-facing products. Luzmo ships a packaged analytics and AI product inside your application, so dashboards, APIs, and AI return the same tenant-scoped number. GoodData is governed analytics infrastructure: workspaces, metrics, and agents. See the Luzmo semantic layer and GoodData. Last verified: 15 September 2026.

  • Does GoodData support multi-tenancy?

    Yes. It uses hierarchical workspaces, Workspace Data Filters, and user-level data filters. See workspace hierarchy. Last verified: 15 September 2026.

  • Does GoodData support row-level security?

    Yes. User Data Filters restrict data for individual users or groups. See User Data Filters. Last verified: 15 September 2026.

  • Does GoodData support column-level security?

    GoodData began a gradual production rollout of Column-Level Permissions in August 2026. Do not treat it as a historical capability on every deployment. See what is new. Last verified: 15 September 2026.

  • Can GoodData white-label analytics?

    Yes. It supports custom branding, JSON themes, color palettes, and custom domain URLs. Themes can be applied at organization, workspace, and user level. See white-labeling. Last verified: 15 September 2026.

  • Does GoodData have a React SDK?

    Yes. GoodData.UI is a React and TypeScript analytics SDK. Developers can also fetch raw analytical data and render their own UI. See GoodData.UI. Last verified: 15 September 2026.

  • Does GoodData support Vue or Angular?

    GoodData supports framework-agnostic Web Components and documents Angular and Vue integration patterns. The full first-party GoodData.UI component SDK is primarily React-based. See embedded visualizations. Last verified: 15 September 2026.

  • Does GoodData have conversational AI?

    Yes. The current Agentic AI Assistant supports conversational and multi-step analytical workflows. Rollout is gradual. Embedded AI Assistant support inside iframe dashboards became GA in July 2026. See AI Assistant. Last verified: 15 September 2026.

  • Does GoodData support MCP?

    Yes. GoodData MCP Server became GA in May 2026. The current pricing page advertises 30+ MCP tools. Compare the same operational workflow with Luzmo MCP rather than counting advertised tools. See MCP Server. Last verified: 15 September 2026.

  • Does GoodData support BYOLLM?

    Yes. BYOLLM means bring your own LLM: connect an approved provider or model instead of the vendor default. GoodData documents it on Enterprise. Luzmo does not officially support BYOLLM. See GoodData LLM providers. Last verified: 15 September 2026.

  • Does Luzmo support Agent-to-Agent (A2A)?

    No. A2A is an agent-to-agent protocol. Luzmo interoperability is REST and MCP. GoodData documents A2A on Enterprise. See the Luzmo MCP server and GoodData A2A. Last verified: 17 September 2026.

  • Does Luzmo have Agent Builder?

    No. Luzmo ships a packaged analyst agent and chart generation. Customers do not get a public builder to author their own agent fleet. GoodData Agent Builder became GA in May 2026. See Luzmo IQ and GoodData Agent Builder. Last verified: 17 September 2026.

  • Does GoodData support self-hosting?

    Yes. Enterprise lists self-hosted deployment on demand, and GoodData.CN is the self-managed product. See GoodData pricing and the GoodData.CN whitepaper. Last verified: 15 September 2026.

  • How much does GoodData cost?

    GoodData does not publish a numeric Professional price. Professional is platform fee plus workspace pricing. Enterprise is custom. See GoodData pricing. Last verified: 15 September 2026.

  • Does GoodData charge per user?

    Its primary current Professional model is workspace-based. Legal terms allow unlimited users with your own IAM, or include up to 100 users with GoodData IAM before additional user purchases. See GoodData legal terms. Last verified: 15 September 2026.

  • Is GoodData cheaper than Luzmo?

    There is not enough public information to answer universally. Luzmo publishes a $2,495 per month starting platform price plus adoption usage. GoodData requires a workspace-based quote. Model the same tenant architecture before comparing. See Luzmo pricing and GoodData pricing. Last verified: 15 September 2026.

  • Does GoodData support CI/CD?

    Yes. Enterprise includes CI/CD data-product management and three environments. GoodData also exposes declarative metadata APIs suitable for Git workflows. Professional is one environment. See GoodData pricing. Last verified: 15 September 2026.

  • Can teams migrate customer-facing analytics from GoodData to Luzmo?

    Yes. Teams can move customer-facing analytics to Luzmo without replacing GoodData everywhere. Expect to remap workspaces, translate MAQL, rebuild custom plugins, and redesign embed authorization. Advanced agents and self-hosting can be migration blockers. Last verified: 15 September 2026.

Appendix

How we research this comparison

Luzmo publishes this comparison and has a commercial interest in the outcome. We cite current first-party documentation, include cases where GoodData is the stronger fit, and update the page when products change.

Reviewed by: Jonathan Wuurman, VP of Growth, Luzmo

Fact-checked against first-party sources

Last full review:

Luzmo publishes this comparison and has a commercial interest in the result. We still want GoodData current capabilities represented accurately, including cases where GoodData is the stronger fit.

GoodData changed substantially in 2026, including a rebrand to GoodData.AI, new packaging, a production MCP Server, and a broader agentic analytics platform.

We checked current functionality using the live pricing page, June 2026 Product Specific Terms, Cloud documentation, SDK documentation, and 2026 release notes.

When GoodData supports a capability, we say so. When availability depends on Professional versus Enterprise, workspace licensing, an AI add-on, on-demand deployment, or a gradual rollout, we show that condition instead of a generic Yes or No.

Performance, implementation speed, AI quality, and developer experience need the same product-shaped test on both platforms.

Suggest a correction

How we label claims

  • Fact : A product capability explicitly documented by the vendor, with a primary source and verification date.
  • Implication : Our interpretation of a documented fact for a buyer. It is not itself a product capability.
  • Recommendation : Who should choose which product, based on the documented facts above.

Source hierarchy

  1. Official technical documentation
  2. Official pricing pages
  3. Official legal terms
  4. Official developer resources
  5. Vendor customer stories for customer-reported outcomes only

Major corrections

  • : Luzmo USD list price updated to $2,495 per month (EUR unchanged at €1,995). Luzmo usage copy aligned with the pricing page: AI and Warp usage, some contracts on monthly active users. GoodData facts unchanged. Not a full re-verification.
  • : Editorial pass: packaged product in the app versus governed infrastructure. Softened a few absolute claims. Not a full re-verification.
  • : AI recast: packaged analyst agent versus an agent factory. Split knowledge and memory. BYOLLM and A2A are no on Luzmo. Not a full re-verification.
  • : Editorial recast: Luzmo identity is the semantic and knowledge layer in the host product. GoodData stays named GoodData. Luzmo list price is $1,995. Warp copy matches the published pricing page. Not a full re-verification.
  • : Full rewrite against GoodData pricing, June 2026 Product Specific Terms, Cloud documentation, SDK documentation, and 2026 release notes. Replaced the outdated enterprise-OEM, caching-only, and AI-supported framing.

Trusted by product teams

  • Lansweeper
  • Greenly
  • Marigold
  • Grubhub
  • Priority
  • Showpad

See Luzmo in your product

Rosita Martorana — Luzmo account executive

Book a walkthrough. See how Luzmo brings analytics into your product experience.